Sämtliche schriften und briefe series I, volume 16
Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften (ed)
p 177

Textes inédits tome 1
Gaston Grua (ed)
p 425

Date: 2/12 October 1698

Translated from the Latin

View this translation in PDF format (10k)

Back to home page

Search texts by keyword(s):

(For search strings, just type the words; don't use quotation marks)


[A I 16, p177] [Gr p425]

     There is no reason why you should have any regard for my teachings beyond what seems to be agreeable. Since a substance consists in productive power, its existence in general certainly will consist in the immediate application of power to work, which in the body is naturally ordered according to dimensions, though it is not supernaturally bound to them. Matter differs from spirit in that (among other things) it has resistance and parts. I would not dare to say that omnipresence is communicable, indeed neither is omniscience or omnipotence, so that, strictly speaking, human nature cannot be said to be omnipotent or omnipresent, unless we understand by such a manner of speaking that human nature is endowed with these divine attributes, so that it can acquire as much perfection as it is capable; or unless we understand it to mean nothing other than this: that the human nature of Christ is the human nature of a man who is omnipotent because he is united with the divinity, so that in fact such a statement about human nature in the abstract is explained in a concrete statement about a man, which adds nothing substantial to him. And certainly omnipotence is not applicable to human nature in itself, nor applicable to a man insofar as he is a man; and the abstracts are determined in this way, so that what may be said about them is applicable to the appropriate concrete concept, for example, what is applicable to Christ not formally because of his divinity, but insofar as he is a man, ought to be assigned to human nature.

© Lloyd Strickland 2004
With gratitude to John Thorley for advice and suggesions